Over twenty years ago, as a junior woodchuck MBA student, I sat in the front row of every marketing class, captivated by the strategic challenge of go-to-market (GTM) execution. Back then, the Four Ps—Product, Price, Place, and Promotion—were the foundation of every growth strategy and path to market dominance.
Fast forward to today, and that once-unified GTM engine has splintered into a patchwork of disconnected initiatives scattered across departments. What was once a coordinated system for driving growth now feels like isolated gears—spinning without alignment. If you’re wondering why your company is struggling to gain traction in the market, or why efficient growth remains elusive despite best-in-class talent and tools—the answer might be simpler than you think: your decentralized GTM is killing your company.
Let’s be honest: marketing has lost control of the go-to-market strategy.
Instead of a single, cohesive function driving growth, the core components of GTM are now distributed across sales, product, customer success, and marketing ops. Each team runs its own playbook, has their own POV on which accounts matter, targets different personas, and sets priorities based on siloed functionally-biased data. The result? Misaligned messaging, fragmented campaigns, inefficient resource allocation—and a GTM motion that pulls itself apart instead of driving forward.
This isn’t a strategy. It's the Hunger Games for GTM.
The deeper problem here is philosophical. What’s the end game? Is the goal to simply hit a quarterly bookings target—or is it to win a market by being the undisputed best at solving a high-impact use case(s)?
If GTM is reduced to a set of disconnected tactics designed to meet short-term KPIs, we’ve abandoned the very essence of strategy. We’re not building a category. We’re not owning a problem. We’re just plugging gaps.
And make no mistake—this fragmentation is a growth killer.
Every boardroom today is laser-focused on two words: efficient growth. The cost to acquire a customer (CAC) has never been higher. Budgets are tighter. Every dollar must deliver.
And yet, here’s what we still hear from experienced leaders:
“I never had budget for customer marketing. My job was to feed sales MQLs.”
— 4X CMO at a $100M SaaS Company
Sound familiar?
That same company is now scrambling and looking at a replan. Marketing has no ownership over expansion. CS is overwhelmed with renewals and firefighting trying to save poor fit customers. Sales is demanding more leads. Product is building ad hoc features to save accounts.
This is what happens when GTM functions in silos.
To move the needle on efficiency, companies must take a bold step: re-centralize the GTM function.
This doesn’t mean putting everything under one org chart—it means creating a shared operating system across marketing, sales, product, and customer success. A system where data, strategy, and execution are aligned.
You have two options:
Both options require a mindset shift. But the payoff is immense: faster growth, lower CAC, and a clear, differentiated position in the market.
Here’s the truth: the companies that win in the next era of GTM will be the ones that treat operations as a first-class citizen.
RevOps isn’t just a tactical reporting layer. It should be the intelligence center of your go-to-market strategy. And as AI tools mature, your ops infrastructure will be the linchpin that determines whether you benefit—or get left behind.
But AI is only as good as the data it’s trained on. Most teams are still drowning in dirty, disconnected, and incomplete data. If you want to harness AI for efficient growth, you must first solve your foundational data problems.
We’re at a tipping point. What began as a well-intentioned distribution of GTM responsibilities has now turned into a costly liability.
But it’s not too late.
By unifying around a clear strategy, aligning your teams, and investing in the connective layer that binds them, you can turn your GTM from a leaky bucket into a precision engine for growth.